Stoner 63A Carbine

Revision as of 08:07, 24 February 2026 by Skizmophonic (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Factions Weapon Icon Classes Ammo

US

Stoner 63A Carbine
Assault
Radioman
30+1 / 90
Damage Base Headshot × Chest × Stomach × Leg × Arm × Bayonet Rifle Grenades Reload Speed
Partial Empty
33 ×2.5 = 82.5 ×1.2 = 39.6 ×1.15 = 37.95 ×0.8 = 26.4 ×0.75 = 19.8 NO NO 2.66 Seconds 3.233
Designation Weapon Type Fire Modes Fire Rate Bullet Spread ° Range Modifier Muzzle Velocity Projectile weight Weight
XM23E1 Carbine Auto+Semi 750 RPM 7.81° & 1.75° ADS 0.935 991 m/s 12.3g (189.8gr) 3.52 kg (7.76 lbs)
Full name Caliber Place of Origin Date Manufacturer Barrel Length Total Length Weapon Script Name
Stoner 63A Carbine 5.56mm USA 1966 Cadillac Gage
Knight's Armament Company
15.7 in (398.8 mm) 36.68 in (931.7 mm) weapon_stoner63_c



The Stoner 63A Carbine is the carbine configuration of the U.S. 5.56×45mm Stoner 63 modular weapon system designed by Eugene Stoner. It is best known for providing a shorter, handier Stoner 63A setup intended for roles where compactness and mobility matter, while retaining the system’s shared receiver and parts commonality with other configurations.

HISTORY

After leaving ArmaLite, Eugene Stoner developed a modular weapons system built around a common receiver with interchangeable components that could be reconfigured into multiple roles. Early prototypes were completed in 1962, and production Stoner 63 weapons in 5.56×45mm began in 1963, with Cadillac Gage as the manufacturer. U.S. testing found reliability and durability issues, leading to an improved production standard—**Stoner 63A**—introduced in 1966.

The **carbine** configuration represented the system’s compact shoulder-fired setup, intended for users who needed a lighter, shorter weapon than the full rifle configuration. In Vietnam, the Stoner 63/63A family saw limited adoption rather than wide standardization, with Navy SEALs the most commonly documented combat users and the U.S. Marines conducting field trials in 1967. Despite favorable performance reports in certain roles, overall complexity, cost, and maintenance considerations limited broader issue, and the system was gradually replaced by later platforms over subsequent decades.

Sources


Real-Life Photos

Videos