M9A1 Flamethrower

Revision as of 05:41, 25 February 2026 by Skizmophonic (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Factions Weapon Icon Classes Fuel Damage
Normal Burn Over Time

US

M9A1 Flamethrower
Engineer
100 5-15 45
Designation Weapon Type Fire Rate Flame Range Damage Weight
[[]] Flamethrowers 600 RPM 512 (Hammer Units?) 15 12 kg (26.46 lbs)
Full name Caliber Place of Origin Date Manufacturer Barrel Length Total Length Weapon Script Name
FN flamethrower fuel USA 1960 ARM in ( mm) in ( mm) weapon_m9a1



The M9A1 (often encountered as the Vietnam-era portable flamethrower family M9/M9A1-7) is a U.S. man-portable backpack flamethrower that projects thickened fuel under pressure for close-range assault use. It is powered by a compressed-gas propellant system and delivered through a handheld projector (“wand”) designed for short bursts. The weapon is best known for Vietnam War use in clearing bunkers, trenches, and fortified positions, and as one of the last U.S. service flamethrowers before replacement by rocket-based incendiary systems.

HISTORY

The M9-series portable flamethrowers were developed by the U.S. Chemical Corps in the late 1950s to address shortcomings of earlier M1/M2 backpack flamethrowers, with an emphasis on reducing weight and improving handling for assault troops. The system paired a backpack fuel/propellant unit with a compact projector group and ignition system intended to be more practical in field conditions, and later refinements produced improved sub-variants (commonly referred to in period documentation as M9E1-7 and, in some contexts, M9A1-7).

In Vietnam, portable flamethrowers were issued for specialized missions where incendiary effects could neutralize dug-in defenders and complex fieldworks that were difficult to reduce with small arms alone. They were employed in assaults on bunkers and fighting positions, in selective clearing tasks, and for short, high-impact engagements where their psychological and tactical effect was significant but their operator vulnerability was also high. By the 1970s the U.S. moved away from man-portable flamethrowers, and the capability was ultimately replaced by systems such as the M202 FLASH.

Sources


Real-Life Photos

Videos